Kayla, who writes the "Whimsically Classic" blog, describes herself as an "old soul," which may explain how she has so much to say about classic film. Her posts tend to be very detailed and informative, and her responses to our questions are no exception to her verbosity and wit. She would like readers to take a look at this post, her entry in last year's "National Classic Film Day" blogathon. She reviews her five favorite classic movie performers and shares why they mean so much to her. She also admits to using the opportunity to re-post favorite images of Errol Flynn and Gene Kelly, because, as she says, "If you can't post (and re-post) beefcake photos on your blog, where can you post them?"
Here are her responses to our questions:
What sparked your interest in classic film?
Growing up in the 90s, I always watched the annual viewing
of "Wizard of Oz" and also enjoyed watching AMC with my dad.
Back when AMC actually showed classic films and wasn't over saturated with
repeats and commercials. I remember Bob Dorian introducing the films much
like Robert Osborne did for TCM. Every Saturday morning, AMC used to show
Laurel & Hardy and Three Stooges shorts. I also seem to remember AMC airing
a New Years Eve marathon of The Marx Brothers. I had always been aware of
classic films and had no issues with them. I would say, however, that I
truly became infatuated with classic film when I discovered "I Love
Lucy" on Nick at Nite in 1995 when I was 11. I remember one summer
evening I was bored and looking for something to watch. I came across
Nick at Nite and on it was an old black and white show. As I watched it,
I became entranced by the woman on the screen--Lucille Ball. If I
remember correctly, the very first episode of "I Love Lucy" that I
saw was "L.A. at Last!" guest-starring William Holden. I
remember laughing so much when Lucy wears her fake nose and subsequently has to
keep re-doing it when she accidentally moves it. The next evening, I
watched "I Love Lucy" again and soon I was hooked. Every night
at 8:00pm, I had to watch "my shows." In addition to 'Lucy,' I
became a big fan of the other shows in the lineup as well. However, my
heart will always belong to "I Love Lucy." From my love of
'Lucy,' soon I wanted to know everything I could about her. I was also an
frequent visitor to the city library where I checked out every Lucille Ball
biography that was available. It was from these books that I learned
about the movie career Lucille Ball had prior to "I Love
Lucy."
It was about at this time when TCM debuted on cable. I
remember seeing it on TV and learning that it was wholly dedicated to classic
film. From then on, every Sunday, I would scour the new TV Guide insert
in the newspaper to see if TCM was airing any Lucille Ball movies that
week. When they'd air, I'd try to watch them, or try to set up the VCR to
record the films. I remember that one of these recordings ended up being
"The Long, Long Trailer," my absolute favorite movie of all
time. I also remember seeing "Du Barry Was a Lady" starring
Lucy and Gene Kelly. It was from this film that I discovered Gene
Kelly. I remember seeing "Singin' in the Rain" in the TV Guide
once and I made a point to watch it. From then on, I loved Gene Kelly and
subsequently loved Debbie Reynolds and Donald O'Connor. This pattern of
discovering new actors and films continued on and has continued
since.
What makes a film a "classic" in your opinion?
Many people like to assign a specific time frame (e.g.
Silent era through Studio Era) to declare a film "classic," however,
I don't agree that that is entirely accurate. To me, a classic is a film
that still resonates with an individual over time. "Citizen
Kane" is often touted as a classic, but if a person dislikes the film, he
or she may be hesitant to declare it a classic. There may be another film
that was universally panned by critics upon release and may still be considered
mediocre today, but if a person absolutely loves it, then who are we to say
that that film isn't a classic? It is a classic to the person who loves it.
I think the term "classic" is very personal to the movie fan.
Watching a film can be a very personal experience and people can come away with
very different perspectives.
What classic film(s) do you recommend to people who say
they hate old movies?
Before suggesting any type of film, first I would pity this
person for having such a narrow outlook on film and immediately dismissing
decades worth of filmmaking purely because it might lack phony special effects
like CGI or color. After I got over my initial annoyance, I'd ask the
person questions and try to gauge if they'd even be open to watching an old
film. Some people are just so set in their ways that trying to get them
to watch an old film would be meaningless. If they are open to watching a
classic film and maybe they just haven't been exposed to the right film, I'd
ask them what types of films they enjoy. If someone loves
mystery/thrillers, I may suggest an Alfred Hitchcock film like Rear Window or
To Catch a Thief. If someone were interested in horror, I might
suggest Frankenstein or Psycho. Someone who loves
romance might enjoy Brief Encounter or perhaps Sabrina.
If someone loves musicals and thinks that La La Land is the
greatest thing ever, I might suggest an infinitely better musical like Singin'
in the Rain or Funny Face. For comedy lovers, I'd suggest
my favorite The Long Long Trailer or maybe Some Like it Hot.
It someone loves overwrought dramas like I do, I would suggest Picnic or
maybe A Summer Place. Finally, if the person is into movies about
teenagers like High School Musical, I might suggest Gidget or
maybe one of the Beach Party movies.
Why should people care about classic film?
People should care about classic film because these are the
films that provided the foundation for all films that have come since.
Without Alfred Hitchcock, we might not have the unique storytelling devices
like the McGuffin that we have today. Without Hitchcock, maybe Stan Lee
wouldn't be making cameos in all the Marvel films! Orson Welles' innovative
filming techniques for Citizen Kane were a landmark in
cinematography and storytelling. The innovative special effects in films
like The Wizard of Oz and King Kong provide the
groundwork for the special effects that have come since. Classic films also
serve as a time machine. Since time travel does not exist, movies are one
of the very few ways we have to see what life may have been like during
previous eras. As someone born in the mid-80s, I am interested in films
made before then so I can see what things may have been like before I was
born. Don't get me wrong, I love 90s movies too, but I was there. I
want to see what World War Two era might have been like in the United
States. Maybe I want to know what cars looked like in the 1950s.
Movies can answer my questions. I've learned a lot about what types of
technologies were available in different eras. Who doesn't love the big
computer in Desk Set? Or the Auto-Mat in Easy Living? Along
those lines, classic film can also serve as an escape. When you just
can't bear seeing one more message film trying to make a point about racism or
domestic violence or what not, what's wrong with going back in time to 1930s
New York and spending the evening drinking martinis with Nick and Nora Charles?
I love to use movies to escape into another a world, a world I cannot visit
without film.
What is the most rewarding thing about blogging?
Having a space to share my enthusiasm and love for a
particular film, television show, actor, song, etc. Even if it's the
smallest little thing about an episode of "The Brady Bunch" or what
not, I love being able to have a space where I can be a total fangirl for a
second and gush. I love focusing on everything I love about classic film
and television. I also enjoy receiving comments about my articles and
even having small discussions about them, because it's rewarding to know that
someone actually spent time reading what you wrote. I do read other
members' blogs too and need to become better at commenting, because I truly
appreciate everyone's articles and sometimes am in awe of what they
produce.
What challenges do you face with your blog, and how do you
overcome them?
Having enough time to write in the blog and being motivated
to do so. Sometimes I overwhelm myself by signing up for too many
blogathons, because everything sounds like so much fun. I also worry that
I need to vary my content more and have other articles aside from
blogathons. I also struggle with trying to figure out what niche I want
my blog to fill. I don't have issues finding my voice, because I can
write and know what I want to write. I am still trying to figure out how
I can organize my blog so that I feel like it's unique from others but isn't
consuming all my time. I have a lot of great ideas, but I need to figure
out if I can execute them without getting overwhelmed, becoming frustrated and
quitting.
What advice would you give to a new blogger?
Write about what you love. Don't worry about having a
gimmick. Be genuine. Don't pretend to like something just because
it's in vogue. If you have a controversial opinion, then share it--for
example, I am not a fan of Marlon Brando. I don't think he's that great
(except for in his 1950s career, when I do like his work) and I truly despise
his mumbling. I also find The Godfather incredibly
boring. Don't be ashamed of what you love or dislike. Take these
words from Dr. Seuss to heart--"Be who you are, and say what you feel
because those who mind don't matter and those who don't matter don't mind."
I love blogs that truly show someone's personality. I dislike blogs where
someone is pretentious and writes a whole lot of words to say nothing. Finally
this is basic, but edit and proofread. And use separate paragraphs! Bad writing
is a turnoff.
Thanks so much Kayla! We'll see you and your boyfriend Errol Flynn at the next gala event!
It was fun to read this interview and get to know Kayla better. New bloggers should take her advice to heart.
ReplyDeleteI remember seeing Rear Window for the first time. James Stewart was such an amazing actor. You hardly see now-a-days really great actors that can play some many different roles. Thanks for the share.
ReplyDeleteGreg Prosmushkin
I agree with what Kayla said about viewers having such a narrow view of film that they refuse to see older movies. Once I asked a film blogger if they had any faves from classic Hollywood, and they said they refused to see anything before the 1970s. (!!!)
ReplyDeleteAlso, I agree re: Marlon Brando's mumbling. Speak UP, for pete sake!
I have to disagree with your definition of a "classic." There's a universal understanding about what constitutes the "classic era" or "golden age" of American cinema. That doesn't mean that every single film emanating from that era is a "great" or even a "good" film. In fact, there were a ton of bad films made during the "classic" era. Whether a particular person enjoys a film from that era is an entirely different question. For instance, Citizen Kane is undoubtedly a "classic" from the golden era. Whether or not you (or anyone else) actually LIKES that film is irrelevant to the fact that it's considered a classic. In other words, a person's personal taste does not determine whether or not it is a "classic."
ReplyDeleteKayla's blog is great. I enjoyed reading this interview and learning more about her.
ReplyDelete